Skip to Page Content Skip to this section's menu Skip to Accessibility Information

Page Specific Menu and Navigation

Oklahoma Journal of Law & Technology

Media & Communications Technology

Links marked with an asterisk (*) open in a new window.


Accessibility Warning

This page contains some legacy content (Adobe pdf files) that may be inaccessible to visitors utilizing screen-reading technologies. We are in the process of upgrading our online technologies to be as accesible as possible for all our visitors. Current Law Students are invited to visit Faculty Support Services in room 3014 of the Law Center for hard copies of the affected files. Thank you for your patience during this transitional process.

Required Software

Some links on this page require the Adobe Acrobat Reader. These links are identified by the letters 'pdf' in parenthesis after the link-- (pdf). Click this link to download the latest version of Acrobat Reader (opens in a new window).

1 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 9 (2004) February 03, 2004

By:  Chris Kannady - html | pdf* - (2003 - 2004 BOE)

THE DO-NOT-CALL LIST: WILL IT SURVIVE?
Chris Kannady, a third year law student in the JD/MBA program at the University of Oklahoma College of Law, gives this overview of the do-not-call list dilemma. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act was enacted in order to protect residential telephone subscribers’ privacy rights to avoid telephone solicitations. However, in 2002, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") began the process of creating the current nationwide do-not-call list that the FTC, not individual telemarketing organizations, would maintain. Within one year, the do-not-call list was finalized and ready to open for public registration. It did not take long before telemarketers filed suit to block the list. This article provides a detailed discussion of the litigation initiated by telemarketers in an attempt to invalidate the do-not-call list. Since the telemarketing industry stands to lose billions of dollars if the list continues to operate, litigation concerning this matter is likely to continue.

Media & Communications Technology Archives

  1. 1 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 1 (2003) (formerly 2003 OKJOLT REV. 1)

    CENSORSHIP ON THE INTERNET: WHO SHOULD MAKE THE RULES?
    By:  Joe Zopolsky - html | pdf* - (2003 - 2004 BOE)
    Published: August 27, 2003

Page Navigation